i8bozo
04-21-2005, 12:59 AM
hello,
i have a shot where i thought it would be advantageous to stabilize the plate and work on it in that mode. all was going well until i decided to use the motion blur on one of my shapes. it didn't work.
from what i'm able to gather...what appears to be happening is the shape is taking it's motion or position info from the tracker and not from the frame by frame position in the plate. in the latter situation, the shape would move an inch across the screen from frame to frame (giving ample info for motion blur to work with). it seems we're not getting that communication between the tracker and the motion blur.
thanks!
.g.
i have a shot where i thought it would be advantageous to stabilize the plate and work on it in that mode. all was going well until i decided to use the motion blur on one of my shapes. it didn't work.
from what i'm able to gather...what appears to be happening is the shape is taking it's motion or position info from the tracker and not from the frame by frame position in the plate. in the latter situation, the shape would move an inch across the screen from frame to frame (giving ample info for motion blur to work with). it seems we're not getting that communication between the tracker and the motion blur.
thanks!
.g.